The Controversy of Race-Based Hiring in Canadian Universities: A Call for Non-Discrimination

Overview of Race-Based Hiring in Canada

In recent years, race-based appointments to academic positions have become increasingly common in Canada. This has given rise to business opportunities within this realm, notably with the emergence of BIPOC Executive Search Inc. in Toronto. This consultancy specializes in recruiting Black, Indigenous, and racialized candidates and currently has job postings for 12 executive positions at three major Toronto universities: York, University of Toronto, and OCAD. As Canadian universities rush to fulfill their race-based hiring mandates, the demand for such services is likely to grow.

The Growing Concern

While BIPOC Inc. is capitalizing on this trend, the underlying issue is the discriminatory practices of its clients. Universities, as public institutions, are expected to uphold the principle of non-discrimination, which is deeply rooted in Canadian laws and the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

Defining Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion (EDI)

Universities often justify their race-based hiring practices in the name of equity, diversity, and inclusion (EDI). According to one Canadian university’s definitions:

• Equity involves promoting fairness and justice considering social and historical issues.
• Diversity measures representation across various identities and backgrounds.
• Inclusion creates an environment where everyone feels a sense of belonging and respect.

The Decline of Non-Discrimination

Despite these definitions, the principle of non-discrimination is reportedly in decline within universities, exacerbated by the federal government’s EDI requirements for research grants and positions like the Canada Research Chairs. A study by the Aristotle Foundation found that 477 out of 489 job advertisements from ten universities included some form of DEI requirement, leading to practices that either restricted hiring to preferred identity groups or gave them preference.

The Affirmative Action Debate

Universities defend their actions as practicing affirmative action, which they argue is constitutionally protected. However, the pressing question remains: how far can they go in the name of affirmative action? If discrimination becomes widespread or unchecked, the principle of non-discrimination is significantly undermined.

A Call to Action

It is crucial for the Canadian public, including alumni and supporters of universities, to advocate for the respect of non-discrimination principles. Many Canadians would likely support efforts to curb race-based admissions and hiring practices. Universities should heed this call and ensure that individual rights are not compromised in the pursuit of diversity.

Peter MacKinnon has served as the president of three Canadian universities and is a Senior Fellow of the Macdonald-Laurier Institute.